Cell Tower Radiation
Is your workplace or home located near a cell tower? There
may be reason for concern.
A new study, billed as the largest of its kind, has shown that radiofrequency
radiation (RFR) emitted from cell towers increases cancer rates in rats.
The finding has the potential to shatter Health Canada’s radiofrequency
exposure guidelines outlined in Safety Code 6.
“…a person can legally be exposed to this level of radiation,” says Ronald Melnick, senior science advisor with the
Environmental Health Trust. “Yet cancers occurred in these animals at these
legally permitted levels.
“Governments need to strengthen regulations to protect the public from these
harmful non-thermal exposures,” adds Melnick.
Map: See how close you are to a cell tower
U.S. researchers release landmark study on cell phones and cancer
U.S. researchers release landmark study on cell phones and cancer
The Ramazzini Institute study found a significant increase
in the incidence of Schwannoma, a rare and highly malignant form of cancer, in
the hearts of male rats exposed to the highest level of RFR. It also found
increases in malignant brain tumors in female rats and precancerous conditions
in both male and female rats.
In the landmark study, rats were exposed to “environmental” cell tower
radiation for 19 hours per day, from prenatal life until natural death,
reproducing the exposure generated by a 1.8 GHz cellphone radio base station
antenna at a strength of 50 volts per metre.
This is significantly lower than what’s currently considered safe in Canada.
Health Canada’s Safety Code 6 currently allows for
exposure in the frequency range of 3 kHz to 300 GHz. At 1.8 GHz, the code
allows for 137 volts per metre in workplaces – significantly higher than the
electric field strength in the study.
The Ontario Ministry of Labour uses this same guideline.
Recent studies on cell phone radiation by the U.S. National Toxicology Program
came to similar findings: male rats treated at the highest dose of RFR
developed the same unusual cancer.
On the basis of these studies and now reinforced by the Ramazzini Institute study,
researchers are also calling for the International Agency for Research on
Cancer (IARC) to reclassify RFR. In 2011, IARC classified it as possibly
carcinogenic to humans.
The strength of radiofrequency fields is greatest at its source, and diminishes
quickly with distance, according to the World Health Organization (WHO). In
other words, the closer you are to an antenna, the more radiofrequency
radiation you are exposed to.
“Typical values inside of buildings at distances up to 200 metres from base station
sites are in the range of 0.1 - 1 (volts per metre),” according to a WHO report on base station exposure.
0 Comments